A cascade of domestic turmoil and global tension sparked by Donald Trump has spotlighted a fundamental question: Just how far does presidential power really extend?
Trump’s recent visit to the Persian Gulf offered a spectacle of imperial optics — purple carpets, fighter jet escorts, and lavish banquets hosted by royalty — reinforcing his narrative of singular, unmatched authority. It echoed the broader tone of his second-term strategy: a presidency defined by dominance.
But spectacle alone won’t secure policy victories or deliver on lofty diplomatic promises. To move beyond symbolic displays and toward substantive achievements, Trump must wield real political leverage — not just perform the role of an all-powerful leader.
In recent days, it’s become clear: while Trump can aggressively exercise executive power and shape foreign policy with broad constitutional backing, the reality is he remains constrained. Not everything bends to his will.
Foreign Leaders Who Refuse to Bow
While Trump can cow many domestic opponents, he faces no shortage of defiant foreign leaders eager to challenge his authority with their own shows of power.
His top global rival, Chinese President Xi Jinping, delivered a sharp reality check. Refusing to cave to Trump’s 145% tariff barrage, Xi forced the U.S. president to retreat, trimming the tariff to 30% under economic pressure and renewed talks with Beijing. The message to world leaders: when Trump’s policies backfire at home, he backs down. That perception could weaken his leverage in future trade confrontations he believes he’s poised to win.
Trump’s image abroad isn’t helping either. In many Western democracies, his unpopularity is a political asset for opponents. In Canada, new Prime Minister Mark Carney rose to power by directly campaigning against Trump — turning resistance into a winning message.
Russia’s Vladimir Putin is another adversary refusing to play by Trump’s script. Despite Trump’s efforts to choreograph peace talks in Turkey — talks he expected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to attend — Putin simply declined the invitation, leaving Trump’s diplomatic overture in limbo.
Yet Trump remained undeterred. “Nothing’s going to happen until Putin and I get together,” he told reporters aboard Air Force One. It’s a revealing remark: even as he pressures Zelensky in public, Trump has resisted using the full weight of U.S. power — such as sanctions or military aid — to bring Putin to the table.
The truth, as history shows, is that no U.S. president — regardless of ego or arsenal — can unilaterally reshape the geopolitical order. Foreign states, like non-state actors, act in service of their interests — not a president’s ambitions.
Trump’s Domestic Power Plays
At home, however, Trump has been far more effective in projecting strongman control.
He’s used executive action to target top law firms involved in litigation against him, silenced dissent in the White House press corps, and even directed federal scrutiny toward institutions like Harvard University after public disagreements. These actions have sparked ongoing legal battles but have also showcased Trump’s determination to use every available lever of presidential power.
The symbolism of his influence lingers: tech titans fawning over him during his inaugural address remain one of the more striking images of his political dominance.
But even at home, power has limits.
Trump had free rein to impose tariffs — but not to control their consequences. On Thursday, Walmart, a bellwether of the U.S. economy, warned that higher duties would drive up prices for consumers. The administration lashed out at critics, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accusing Amazon of a “hostile and political act” for allegedly considering displaying tariff-related price hikes on its websites — a plan that never materialized. But the response itself showed the White House knows that consumer backlash could unravel Trump’s economic strategy.
Testing the Courts’ Restraints
Trump’s second term is reaffirming a key dynamic of American governance: courts are powerful — but often too slow to stop a determined president in real time.
Take the case of sweeping federal cutbacks. Many of the most severe reductions carried out by Government Efficiency Chief Elon Musk have since been suspended or overturned in court. But by the time the judiciary acted, crucial programs had already been gutted. Legal losses may follow, such as in the fight over dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, but the humanitarian cost is already being felt — and future administrations will struggle to rebuild.
Trump’s belief in near-total presidential authority — visible during his first term — was emboldened by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling that expanded presidential immunity for official acts. Now, his inner circle is purged of dissenters, and his administration is embracing the most sweeping interpretation of executive power in modern memory.
One key tactic: declaring national emergencies on issues like trade and immigration to unlock dormant presidential authorities. Meanwhile, a compliant Republican majority in Congress has refused to check him, wary of alienating Trump’s devoted grassroots base.
To be sure, Trump didn’t invent this trend. For decades, as Congress has grown more gridlocked and dysfunctional, presidents from both parties — including Barack Obama and Joe Biden — increasingly leaned on executive orders to bypass legislative inertia.
But Trump, as ever, has pushed that playbook to its absolute limits.
Supreme Court Again Confronts the Boundaries of Presidential Power
As Trump concluded his Gulf tour in the United Arab Emirates on Thursday, Washington turned its attention to a familiar battleground: the limits of presidential authority. At the center of the storm was the Supreme Court, which held a consequential hearing that could reshape the legal guardrails surrounding the presidency.
The case stems from Trump’s attempt to overturn the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. At issue is whether the Court will lift a series of nationwide injunctions blocking the administration from enforcing the policy. A ruling in Trump’s favor could not only upend a core interpretation of the 14th Amendment but also undercut the ability of individual federal judges to freeze controversial policies — removing one of the few institutional checks left on Trump’s expansive vision of executive power. And the consequences would likely ripple far beyond immigration.
Simultaneously, the administration is weighing an even more explosive move: suspending habeas corpus — the foundational right allowing detainees to challenge their detention in court. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller confirmed the possibility last week, suggesting it was being considered as a form of leverage against a judiciary he views as obstructive. “A lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not,” Miller warned, in language critics have called openly authoritarian.
Trump’s Political Muscle Faces a Domestic Test
When Trump lands back in Washington on Friday night, a different kind of test awaits — whether he still holds enough political capital to bend Congress to his will.
Republican lawmakers are expected to spend the weekend negotiating what Trump has dubbed his “big, beautiful bill” — a sweeping package that touches many of his core priorities: deep tax cuts, expanded fossil fuel production, and increased military spending. The bill also proposes severe reductions in public assistance programs like Medicaid and food stamps — cuts that could directly affect many of Trump’s working-class supporters.
House Speaker Mike Johnson is under pressure to muscle the legislation through the chamber, relying on a razor-thin GOP majority and Trump’s strong grip on the party’s grassroots. The early months of a presidency often offer a fleeting window of peak influence — and Trump’s allies hope to capitalize on it.
But even if the bill scrapes through the House, its path through the Senate looks far more uncertain. Resistance from moderate Republicans, combined with unified Democratic opposition, could stall or fracture Trump’s legislative ambitions.
Still, the stakes are clear: Trump’s hopes for a second-term legacy — domestically and globally — hinge on his ability to compel both lawmakers and foreign leaders to follow his lead. Whether he can translate his forceful persona into concrete policy victories remains one of the defining questions of his presidency.
+ There are no comments
Add yours